Is AI Recommending You -
Or Your Competitor?
Find Out Tomorrow Morning. And Every Morning After.
Your buyers ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google's AI Overview (AIO), and Google's AI Mode who to trust. We ask the same questions every day, across all six AI engines, and tell you straight: who got recommended, whether it was you, and who's taking your spot.
Then we show you how to take it back: the topics the winning pages cover that yours doesn't, the exact words they use that you don't, and the first thing to fix. Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), served ready to use.
$2 a month per question. All six engines included. That's the whole price list.
No AI opinions, no mystery scores - every answer is calculated from real data you can open and check.
The Problem with AI Visibility Guesswork
AI answers are deciding who gets recommended before anyone reaches a search results page - and most tools measure them badly
You Can't See What AI Says About You
The AI answer your buyer gets depends on the engine, the day, and where they asked from. Unless you're checking all six engines daily from a fixed location, you have no idea whether AI recommends you, your competitor, or a Reddit thread.
Screenshot Tools Sell You a Coincidence
One check, on one day, presented as your "AI ranking." AI answers change day to day - a single observation is noise wearing a dashboard. Without a real sample behind the number, you're paying for an anecdote.
Noisy Dashboards Cry Wolf
Tools that alert on every wiggle train you to ignore them. Without sample sizes, confidence intervals, or correction for multiple comparisons, "your visibility dropped 12%" is a coin flip dressed up as an emergency.
We Do the Math. You Read the Sentence.
One tracked prompt is one buyer question, typed into all six AI engines once a day, every day, from the geography you choose - and everything it finds arrives already translated
It Looks Like Magic Because the Math Is Good
Thirty checks a month, per prompt, per engine, build a real sample behind every sentence we show you. Each check records whether an AI answer appeared, whether you were cited and at what position, every source the answer cited, and the full answer text. You get the conclusion; the working is always one click away.
Verdicts, Not Charts
Every prompt gets a plain-English headline - "Cited by all 6 engines," "Not cited - and here's who is," "No engine returns an AI answer for this question." Underneath, every rate carries its sample size, so you always know how solid the ground is.
Alerts Only When It's Real
Before anything is called a change, it's tested against the odds it's just noise - the same math medical journals use, run automatically every month. When nothing real happened, the report says "nothing changed" instead of inventing drama to keep you clicking.
Competitors Discovered, Not Guessed
Your competitor list is built from what the AI answers actually cite - not from anything you typed in. Every cited domain is tracked automatically: days held, links carried, best position. When someone new starts winning your answers, you're told - and it's checked math, not an eyeball call.
The Full Answer, Archived
Every check stores the complete capture: the answer text with its citation links, every cited source, the organic results beside it, and People Also Ask. Day-over-day changes are measured with deterministic text diffs - "answer 92% different, sources 25% different" - reproducible by hand.
Every AI Answer Has Its Winners.
We Know Exactly What They're Doing That You're Not.
The same math that breaks down your SERP competitors runs on every page the AI answers cite - measured, compared to your page, and handed back as a to-do list
Engine-by-Engine Daily Grid
One row per day, one column per engine: Cited (with your citation position), Shown, or None. Open any day to read the archived answer, its cited sources with your site badged, and the surrounding results. Days with no check say so - a measurement gap never counts toward a rate.
Three Report Emails
A daily digest of real movements - first showings, statistically surprising absences, sustained declines - yours first, then the field. A Monday report comparing matched week-over-week windows. A monthly report that's the only one allowed to say "significant," with every alert tagged by what it harms: visibility or traffic.
Cited-Page Intelligence
Every page the AI cites is measured on 33 characteristics - content, structure, schema, readability, Core Web Vitals - and your page is measured the exact same way. The comparison comes back as sentences: what you're already doing like the cited pages, and where you differ most. The full table with every number sits right below it.
Told What to Fix, In Order
The topics the cited pages share, which your page covers, which it's missing, and whether each theme is holding, gaining, or fading across the month. "Use these words" lists, the table stakes every cited page agrees on, and exactly one "first thing to fix" per prompt - not a hundred-item audit dump.
How the System Actually Works
All calculated, nothing improvised - and the working is always on display
No AI Making the Decisions
No language model decides whether you're doing well. Every sentence on your dashboard is assembled by arithmetic from measured data - deterministic, repeatable, and incapable of asserting something the data didn't show. AI answers are the thing being measured, never the thing doing the judging.
Daily Captures From Your Geo
Each prompt is checked from the country you choose, with US state-level precision. The geo is part of the series' identity - the same question from another location is a different series - so every data point in a series is comparable for its whole life.
Drill Down to the Raw Numbers
Every claim opens up: the day-by-day table behind the rate, the sample size behind the verdict, the archived answer behind the citation. "Nothing moved" and "no AI answer appeared all week" are reported as findings, not hidden behind blank panels. If anything ever looks like magic, the working is one click away.
What We're Actually Promising
Honest expectations about what this tool delivers and what it doesn't
What You Get: The Evidence
A daily six-engine record of whether AI answers cite you, from a fixed geo, with every answer archived. Rates with confidence intervals and honest claim tiers. Significance-tested monthly alerts. A competitor roster discovered from real citations. A 33-characteristic comparison between your page and the pages AI actually cites, with the topical gaps spelled out.
This is what we deliver every time.
What We're Not Promising
We can't make an AI engine cite you. We won't claim a change is significant before the sample supports it - preliminary reads start at 15 checks, full reads at 30, and month-over-month verdicts need two whole months of data. AI answers are genuinely volatile; we measure and report that volatility instead of hiding it.
What we are saying: You'll know exactly where you stand in AI answers, exactly what changed and when it's real, and exactly what the cited pages have that yours doesn't. What you build with that evidence is the GEO work - and it's yours.
Why This Beats Screenshot Trackers
Coverage, rigor, and pricing that's genuinely hard to match
All Six Engines, One Price
Google AI Overview, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot - $2 per prompt per month covers every one of them. No per-engine tiers, no add-ons, no upsells. $200 a month tracks 100 prompts across the entire AI answer landscape.
Simple on Top, Rigorous Underneath
Other tools hand you a mystery score and make you do the interpreting. This hands you the interpretation - "you're cited less often for this question" - and keeps the full evidence underneath it: the daily checks, the sample size, the test that decided it was real. Simple to read precisely because the math underneath is done right.
A Permanent, Verifiable Archive
Every answer ever captured stays readable - what the AI said, who it cited, and how much it changed from the day before. Retire a prompt any time; checks run through the paid month and the results stay in your account. Your history is never rewritten.
Geo-Locked Series
AI answers differ by where they're asked from. Pick any supported country - with US state-level targeting - and every daily check runs from there for the life of the series. Your trend line measures the answer changing, not your tool wandering the map.
How It Works in Practice
From buyer question to statistical evidence in three straightforward steps
Write the Prompt
A real question your buyers ask. Free coaching checks it as you type - duplicates, brand placement, shape - and pulls suggested terms from your own crawl and Search Console. Run a free live Google check first to see whether an AIO appears and who it cites, before spending a slot.
Daily Checks Build the Sample
All six engines, every day, from your chosen geo. The day grid fills immediately. Topical comparisons unlock at seven measured days, preliminary statistical reads at 15 checks, full reads at 30, and month-over-month significance tests once two whole months exist.
Read the Evidence, Do the GEO
See who the answers cite and how you compare on 33 characteristics. Close the topical gaps with "use these words." Watch competitors enter and leave with statistical confirmation. Get the daily digest, the Monday report, and the monthly significance verdict in your inbox.
Simple, Transparent Pricing
One flat rate per tracked prompt - all six engines included
Per-Prompt Tracking
- All six AI engines - one price, no add-ons
- Checked daily: 30 checks per month, per engine
- Geo-locked: any supported country, US state-level targeting
- Every answer archived and readable
- 95% confidence intervals on every rate
- Significance-tested monthly alerts, corrected for multiple comparisons
- Daily, weekly, and monthly report emails
- Competitor roster discovered from real citations
- 33-characteristic cited-page comparison and topical gap analysis
- Free prompt coaching and a free live AIO check before you buy
Stop Guessing What AI Says About You
Six engines, daily checks, real statistics - $2 per prompt per month
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about tracking your visibility in AI answers
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is the practice of earning citations in AI-generated answers - the AI-era counterpart to SEO. AI visibility tracking is the measurement half of that work: knowing whether AI engines cite your site for the questions your buyers ask, and whether that's improving.
You can't optimize what you can't measure. We provide the measurement - daily, from a fixed geography, with statistics honest enough to build decisions on. The optimization work is guided by what we find: which pages get cited, what those pages look like, and which topics your page is missing.
All six major AI answer surfaces: Google AI Overview (AIO), Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot.
One price covers all of them - $2 per tracked prompt per month. There are no per-engine tiers and no add-ons, because splitting the same daily check into six line items would just be a pricing trick.
A prompt is one real question your buyers ask - "best project management software for construction," "is [your product] worth it," "how do I fix X." One tracked prompt is one slot: that exact question, typed into all six engines once a day, every day, from the geography you chose.
$2 per month buys the daily checks on all six engines, the full answer archive, the statistics, the cited-page analysis, the competitor tracking, and the three report emails. Billing renews monthly from your credit pool, and you can retire a prompt at any time - checks run through the paid month and the results stay in your account.
Because AI answers change constantly, and a small sample can't tell change from noise. Daily checking produces 30 observations per month per engine - enough to put a real confidence interval around your citation rate and to run actual significance tests month over month.
A weekly check gives you four data points a month. Nobody can distinguish a trend from a coincidence with four data points - though plenty of tools will happily sell you the attempt.
The AI Overview is the AI-generated answer Google shows above the traditional results. When it appears, it absorbs clicks that used to go to the organic listings - so whether Google shows an AIO for your query at all is a traffic question, separate from whether you're cited in it.
We track both: how often an AI answer appears for your prompt, and how often you're cited when it does. If Google starts showing an AIO for a query that used to send you organic traffic, that's a traffic-tagged alert - it answers the classic mystery of "my rankings are fine but my traffic dropped."
They're tested. A month-over-month change only becomes an alert after passing Fisher's exact test and surviving correction for every other test we ran that period. That correction matters: run thirty comparisons and pure chance hands you a "significant" result or two. Most tools skip it and alert on the chance results.
When we ran the tests and nothing survived, the monthly report says exactly that: "N tests were run and none survived correction." Movement without significance is noise, and we'd rather say so than sell you a panic.
Both. Every page the AI answers cite is measured on 33 characteristics - word count, headings, structured data, readability, internal links, Core Web Vitals, and more - and those characteristics are correlated against citation for your specific prompt. Your page is measured identically and compared in plain English.
On the topical side, we extract the phrases the cited pages share, show which your page covers, which it's missing, and which are gaining or fading across the month. You get "use these words" lists, the table stakes every cited page agrees on, and exactly one "first thing to fix" per prompt - not a hundred-item audit dump.
We don't ask you - we watch the answers. Every domain the AI cites for your prompts enters the roster automatically: how many prompts it holds, how many days it's been cited, how many links it carries, its best position, and when it was last seen.
That means the roster is the market as the AI actually defines it, including the competitors you didn't know you had. When a new domain starts appearing consistently, or an incumbent drops out, that movement is statistically confirmed before it's reported.
No - AI answers differ meaningfully by where they're asked from, especially for anything with local or regional intent. A "best CRM" answer in Texas can cite different sources than the same question asked from London.
Every tracked prompt runs from a geography you choose - any supported country, with US state-level precision - and keeps that geography for the life of the series. That's what makes your trend line trustworthy: it measures the answer changing, not the checking location wandering.
Yes, twice over. First, free prompt coaching runs as you type: near-duplicate detection against everything you already track, brand-placement checks tuned to the prompt's type, and shape checks - advice, never a gate.
Second, a free live check asks Google right now, from your chosen geo, and shows whether an AI Overview comes back and who it cites - including whether you're in it - before you commit the slot.
That's a finding, and it's reported as one. "No AI answer appeared for this question all week" tells you AI isn't intermediating that query yet - which might mean your organic rankings still carry the traffic, or that the question needs rewording to match how buyers actually ask.
Rates are always computed against days an answer actually appeared, never against calendar days - so a quiet surface reads as a quiet surface, not as a mysterious zero.
The daily grid starts filling from the first check - you'll see cited/shown/none per engine, with the full archived answer behind every day. Topical comparisons of cited pages unlock at seven measured days.
Statistical claims arrive on an honest schedule: preliminary reads at 15 checks, full reads at 30, and month-over-month significance verdicts once two whole months of data exist. Until then, the interface shows you the data and tells you plainly it's too early to conclude - which is the correct answer, even if it's less exciting than a fake one.
Yes. SEOLinkMap ships an MCP server, so an AI assistant you use - Claude, or anything MCP-capable - can list your tracked prompts, read the full results with rates and confidence intervals, and even queue new tracking on your behalf.
Spending still requires human approval: an agent can place an order, but a person confirms it before a credit moves.
Retiring a prompt stops future billing - checks continue through the month you've already paid for, then stop. Everything already captured stays in your account: the day grid, the archived answers, the statistics, all of it.
Your history is never rewritten and never held hostage. If you restart the same prompt later, it begins a new series, cleanly separated from the old one.